- Case summary
-
Reconsideration of an order refusing special leave by two judges of the SCA: test has stringent requirements as the threshold is now higher: whether the courts below, including the decision of the two SCA judges, ought to have granted leave or not: appellant failed to show special circumstances: special leave refused.
Loading PDF...
This document is 200.5 KB. Do you want to load it?
Cited documents 8
Judgment 4
1. | Van Wyk v S , Galela v S (20273/2014; 20448/2014) [2014] ZASCA 152 (29 September 2014) | 48 citations |
2. | S v Matshona (509/2007) [2008] ZASCA 58 (28 May 2008) | 23 citations |
3. | S v Khoasasa (515/2001) [2002] ZASCA 113 (20 September 2002) | 16 citations |
4. | Gayiya v S (1018/2015) [2016] ZASCA 65 (19 May 2016) | 5 citations |
Legislation 4
1. | Criminal Procedure Act, 1977 | 3915 citations |
2. | Magistrates' Courts Act, 1944 | 2746 citations |
3. | Superior Courts Act, 2013 | 1697 citations |
4. | Criminal Law (Sexual Offences and Related Matters) Amendment Act, 2007 | 445 citations |